Legal Opinion

State v. Logan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 8526SC945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In his brief, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial, in denying his motion for continuance to allow him to locate a non-appearing confidential in*422formant and in instructing the jury. We overrule each of defendant’s assignments of error and find no error in the trial.

On direct examination, Agent Beatty testified that he had made visits to the Newland Road residence on 16 and 21 July and identified defendant as the person with whom he dealt. On cross-examination, Beatty testified that he did not know defendant before 16 July 1985 but was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. NewkirkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API