Legal Opinion
Fairfield Affiliates v. Rosenbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 21, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Boris Rosenbaum and Tamara Rosenbaum appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated June 12, 1995, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff established a prima facie case by showing that the appellants executed the loan documents and defaulted on the mortgage (see, Union State Bank v Blankfort, 222 AD2d 430; ICC Bridgeport Ltd. Partnership v Primrose Dev. Corp., 221 AD2d 417;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Bank v. FioravantiNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bennell Hanover Associates v. NeilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Rattet & LiebmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- ICC Bridgeport Limited Partnership v. Primrose Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- European American Bank v. Strab Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Green Point Savings Bank v. SpiveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Varde Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. KrumholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998