In re Work
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
[In review of the action of the district court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania.] In bankruptcy.
Read the full summary
[In review of the action of the district court of the United States for the Western district of Pennsylvania.] In bankruptcy. The copartnership of Work, McCouch & Co., of the city of Philadelphia, bankers and Brokers, consisting of Samuel Work and William McCouch, of said city, in the Eastern district of Pennsylvania, and Allen Kramer, Florence Kramer, and Edward Rahm, of the city of Pittsburgh, in the Western district of the same state, failed in the month of May. 1866, heavily indebted; on the 9th day of June, 1866, the partners in Pittsburgh made a general assignment of their copartnership…
1Opinion of the Court
The court, after consideration by
McKENNA, Circuit Judge,
delivered a verbal opinion, and directed the entry of the following decree. “And now, May 12th, 1873, the de*625murrer and bill of review having been argued by counsel pro and con, and duly considered by the court, the demurrer is overruled and the decree of the district court is reversed as to Edward Rahm, Samuel Work, and William McCouch.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wright's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879