Randolph County v. Ralls
Illinois Supreme Court
James M. Ralls presented to the comity court an account for certain service claimed to he rendered under a special act of the legislature, which account the county court refused to pay. Erom the order rejecting said account, the said plaintiff "below appealed.
Read the full summary
James M. Ralls presented to the comity court an account for certain service claimed to he rendered under a special act of the legislature, which account the county court refused to pay. Erom the order rejecting said account, the said plaintiff "below appealed. Hie Circuit Court of Randolph county, Breese, Judge, presiding, at May term, 1856, made the following order in the case: “And now come the said parties, and by consent this suit is tried by the court, and the facts being admitted, and the question of law arising thereon, the court finds for the plaintiff $103,” for copying records,…
1Opinion of the CourtSkinner, J.
Ralls presented to the County Court of Randolph county a claim against the county for allowance. The court refused to allow the claim, and entered an order of dis-allowance, from which order Ralls appealed to the circuit court. The record from the circuit court shows that the parties appeared, and that by their consent the cause was tried by the court. The circuit court rendered judgment against the county, and directed in the judgment order that the county court allow to Ralls the amount of the judgment, and issue to him an order therefor. From this judgment the County of Randolph appealed.…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Pocahontas Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Town of Audubon v. HandIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. PerenchioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Smith v. District Court of Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.