Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walter Apschnikat v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1970No. 19314_1Published

1DissentCombs, Circuit Judge

I do not disagree with the majority’s statement of the legal principles applicable to this case, but I think there is a total lack of proof to sustain the theory of the case on which they rely.

The District Court directed a verdict for the Government at the close of taxpayers’ evidence on the theory that taxpayers had purchased Lenk Manufacturing Company with the corporation’s own money, thereby receiving a benefit which amounts to a constructive dividend. The District Judge, in his analysis of the case and statement of his reasons for directing a verdict, made no finding, either directly or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elk Valley Coal Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Murphy v. TorstrickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  3. Johnson v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  4. Long v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
  5. Tarrants v. Henderson County Farm BureauCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API