Legal Opinion

Karron v. Karron

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1965Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank J. Pino, J.

In an action to impress a constructive trust, defendant Herbert Karron (hereinafter called Herbert) moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it fails to state a cause of action. The remaining defendants similarly move to dismiss the complaint and additionally assert that the plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff Natalie Karron (hereinafter called Natalie) is the wife of Herbert and the remaining plaintiffs are the children of their marriage; that Natalie and Herbert are not living together as husband and wife; that on July 16,1965, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Finch v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Melenky v. . MelenNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Brownell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Roens v. RatkinNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API