Legal Opinion

In Re Ridenour

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1945No. 29714PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

— This proceeding came before this court on the application of Russel R. Ridenour (hereinafter referred to as Mr. Ridenour or applicant) for an order to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue, in order that this court might review the action of the board of governors of the Washington state bar association (hereinafter referred to as the board) in refusing to allow Mr. Ridenour’s application and recommend to this court that ápplicant be admitted on motion to practice law in all the courts of this state.

Upon the filing of the application, supplemented by Mr. Ridenour’s affidavit,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleishbein v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Goddard v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Application of Mark W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API