Legal Opinion

Lord v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1975No. 50239PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction of burglary through invoking two legal principles. One of these contends there is an absence of independent evidence sufficient to meet the requirements stated in Caldwell v. State, 227 Ga. 703, 706 (182 SE2d 789) for sustaining a felony conviction based upon the testimony of an accomplice. The other argument relies upon our court’s holding in Pittman v. State, 110 Ga. App. 625, 627 (139 SE2d 507) that "When a substance analyzed has passed through several hands its custody at all times should be accounted for. The evidence must not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pittman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Starks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Self v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Meadows v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Roland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API