Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Croker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 11, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

Pending the hearing and determination of an interlocutory appeal in chancery, the parties entered into a compromise agreement to be filed in the suit, by which it was' provided that if the defendant, Bula E. Croker, should pay to the complainant, R. E. Robinson, a specified sum of money the same would be accepted in full settlement of the case, but if not paid according to the agreement, then that said compromise agreement should be made the decree of the Court in the cause respecting the rights put in controversy. On the basis of such agreement, appellee, Bula E. Croker, has made this motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Brownlow v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Commercial Cable Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Glass v. LaytonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. DupuisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Skyway Trap & Skeet Club, Inc. v. SOUTHWEST FLA. WATER MANAGEMENT DIST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Florida Power Corp. v. Withlacoochee River Electric Cooperative, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API