Legal Opinion

Struthers v. Clay

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

It is not understood to be claimed that the plaintiff was guilty of negligence in operating his car on this dark and foggy morning over this road where the accident happened, and presumably the municipality would be reluctant to claim it was negligent to operate a car in the night season or in a fog over one of its improved roads.

Evidence has been introduced upon the subject of the health and mental condition of the plaintiff for some time preceding the accident; that he had been for a week or such a matter in a sanitarium; that he had been subject to some delusions. It does not appear .to be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Columbus CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Tetlow, Admr. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API