Legal Opinion
In Re Fricker
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1996No. 19-10493PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
Presently before this court is a motion (“the Motion”) filed by R/S Financial Corp. (“the Movant”), seeking sanctions against David M. Still, Esquire, the Debtor’s counsel (“Counsel”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure (“F.R.B.P”) 9011. The relief sought is payment of the Movant’s legal fees of $4,873.11 incurred in defending an unsuccessful adversary proceeding (“the Proceeding”) initiated by Counsel on behalf of the Debtor, the result of which is reported as In re Fricker, 192 B.R. 388 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1996) (“Fri cker V").
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Albert J. Gaiardo and Patricia Gaiardo, His Wife v. Ethyl Corporation, A/K/A Ethyl Corporation, Visqueen DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Landon v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Liebersohn v. Zisholtz (In Re Martin's Aquarium, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998