Legal Opinion

Casteel v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 1943No. 4275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

On information, appellant was charged with the crime of arson. It was alleged that he did “feloniously aid, abet, assist and advise and encourage the burning of a 1935 . . .' Pontiac automobile . . . the property of Morris Henson, Bert Casteel (appellant) and Porter Wilson Finance Company”; that Beilis Garrett, (an accomplice), did the actual burning, and that the automobile was worth more than $25. Upon trial appellant was convicted, and the jury fixed his punishment at three years in the state penitentiary. From the judgment on this verdict comes this appeal.

For reversal appellant urges…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Slinkard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Mullen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Johnson v. Truck Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Shamlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API