Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Williston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 28, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract under R. L. c. 99, •§§ 4-7, now G. L. c. 137, §§ 4-6, to recover payments alleged to have been made on wagering transactions in the year 1916. The writ is dated March 24, 1919. An auditor was appointed by the Superior Court, presumably under St. 1914, c. 576, § 2, now G. L. c. 221, § 56. The case was heard by that court without a jury, upon the auditor’s report and without other evidence. The plaintiff made a motion in writing that upon all the evidence a finding be ordered for the plaintiff for the amount claimed in the declaration, with interest from the date…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Carriere v. Merrick Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Rice v. WinslowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Zembler v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Barrell v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Lally v. WillistonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API