Wilderman v. Wilderman
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:
Plaintiff has moved for the entry of an order awarding her reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in this litigation on the basis of her successful prosecution of the derivative aspects of this case, which was brought, in part, for the benefit of the defendant corporation, Marble Craft Company, Inc. Thus, in prosecuting such action, plaintiff, in her individual capacity, sought the entry of an order compelling payment of what she claimed to be improperly withheld corporate dividends, but she also sued derivatively to recover from the defendant Joseph…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- McCourt v. Singers-BiggerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Sarner v. SarnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Wilderman v. WildermanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,807 in Re the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company Securities and Antitrust Litigation, Appeal of Objector Irving Trust Company, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Krause v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012