Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Richardson v. Green

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1987No. 85-1352Published

1ConcurrenceTerry, Associate Judge

With considerable reluctance, I join in the opinion and judgment of the court. I am very uncomfortable with the notion that private parties may not agree among themselves, without the involvement of a lawyer or the intervention of the probate court, to resolve their claims to an estate to which they are all heirs. This was entirely permissible at common law. When the estate is relatively small, as it is here, the financial burden of going through probate plainly outweighs the supposed benefits of the probate process. In this case, however, the legislative intent to repeal the common law rule…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Tuten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API