First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Petitioners, the First Amendment Coalition and Coalition members, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, request that this Court issue a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent Judicial Inquiry and Review Board to file with this Court as a public document the record of its investigation of charges against a member of the judiciary of this Commonwealth. As the Board, a constitutionally independent body, has made no recommendation to this Court of suspension, removal, discipline, or compulsory retirement in this matter, this Court is…
2Cited by19 opinions
- James M. Scott, Jr. v. Robert C. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- The First Amendment Coalition, Frederick J. Huysman and Daniel R. Biddle, in 84-1164 v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, in 84-1153Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re Subpoena on Jud. Inq. & Rev. Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.