Legal Opinion

First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1983No. 76 E.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1983PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

Petitioners, the First Amendment Coalition and Coalition members, the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, request that this Court issue a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent Judicial Inquiry and Review Board to file with this Court as a public document the record of its investigation of charges against a member of the judiciary of this Commonwealth. As the Board, a constitutionally independent body, has made no recommendation to this Court of suspension, removal, discipline, or compulsory retirement in this matter, this Court is…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. James M. Scott, Jr. v. Robert C. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. The First Amendment Coalition, Frederick J. Huysman and Daniel R. Biddle, in 84-1164 v. Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, in 84-1153Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  4. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In Re Subpoena on Jud. Inq. & Rev. Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API