Williamson v. Ash
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Assumpsit by Ash against Williamson, for rent of a store-room. Judgment below for the plaintiff.
The case is this. Isaac Ash owned a building, erected and used in parts, for two purposes—one part for a dwelling, and one for a mercantile store-room. He died. Catharine Ash, the plaintiff, was his wife, and his widow. She continued to occupy the dwelling-house. The heirs took possession of, and rented the store-room. After a year or more had elapsed, the house, including the store-room, was, upon application of the widow, set off to her as dower. Subsequently she brought this suit against…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grimes v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
- Adkins v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raulerson v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Davis v. LowdenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
- Cavender v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Murray v. MountsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862