Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Ash

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Assumpsit by Ash against Williamson, for rent of a store-room. Judgment below for the plaintiff.

The case is this. Isaac Ash owned a building, erected and used in parts, for two purposes—one part for a dwelling, and one for a mercantile store-room. He died. Catharine Ash, the plaintiff, was his wife, and his widow. She continued to occupy the dwelling-house. The heirs took possession of, and rented the store-room. After a year or more had elapsed, the house, including the store-room, was, upon application of the widow, set off to her as dower. Subsequently she brought this suit against…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grimes v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Adkins v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raulerson v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Davis v. LowdenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  3. Cavender v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  4. Murray v. MountsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API