Legal Opinion

In re Schmidt's Will

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 23, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Application for the probate of a codicil to the last will and testament of Oscar Egerton Schmidt.. deceased. Decree entered, admitting the codicil to probate.

1Opinion of the Court

FOWLER, S.

On June 1, 1905, Oscar Egerton Schmidt, a resident of this city, made his last will and testament in due form of law, which is not disputed. This instrument has been duly proved and is entitled to probate. By the second clause of this undisputed will testator devised the estate, consisting of some 317% acres and a house, all known as the “Poplars” and situated at Lloyd’s Neck, Long Island, in the county of Suffolk, state of New York, together with the appurtenances and the portraits of the Lloyd family contained in the house, to his namesake Mr. Oscar Egerton Stevens. On the 3d day…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Dougherty v. . MillikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Pollock v. . PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Clark v. FisherNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  5. Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. In re Gedney's WildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of MartinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
  5. In re the Proof & Probate of the Last Will & Testament of WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API