Minter v. Minter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Defendant raises three issues on appeal. First, that the trial court erred in concluding that the defendant failed to meet his burden of proof in showing that certain assets were separate in nature; second, that the trial court erred in determining that no portion of the assets were separate in nature; and third, that the trial court failed to consider the defendant’s separate property contributions as a distributional factor pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-20(c). We disagree as to the first two issues but agree as to the third.
Barbara A. Minter (plaintiff-appellee) instituted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Alexander v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re B.E.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Childers v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015