Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buckley v. Columbia Grammar & Preparatory

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 16, 2007Published

1Dissent

Mazzarelli, J.P. (dissenting in part).

I would modify the order appealed, to the extent of reinstating plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and granting their cross motion for summary judgment on that cause of action. Plaintiff Scott Buckley, a mechanic’s helper, was injured while testing a “Monospace” elevator, which he and his supervisor, Glen Birnbaum, were installing on a construction site.

The work took place in stages. First, Buckley and Birnbaum installed two rails for the elevator and two rails for its counterweights. They then erected a sling to contain the elevator platform. A motor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Outar v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Boyle v. 42nd Street Development Project, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API