Legal Opinion

Fowler v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1943No. 14645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Grounds 3 and 5 of the motion for new trial, set forth in the preceding statement, will be considered together; and since they deal with a situation that has now for the first time confronted this court, some exposition will be made of the rulings thereon announced in the headnotes. The gist of the contention of counsel concerning these grounds is that under the facts as presented the defendant could not have had a trial by an impartial jury, as guaranteed to him under the constitution. Code, § 2-105. This contention rests upon the mere fact that the prisoner was brought into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Rigor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. United States v. MarrinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. In re AndrewsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. GrimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Starr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. People Ex Rel. Hesley v. RagenIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Seay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Allbright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API