Legal Opinion

Booth v. National Surety Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover on a replevin bond executed by the National Surety Company as surety. In an action to recover possession of a Ford coupe wherein J. A. Lang was plaintiff and Percy B.. Booth, plaintiff herein, was defendant, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant for the return of the automobile and for costs amounting to $15.50. However, there was no alternative judgment so that defendant could recover the value of the car in the event a return thereof was not had. After such termination of the replevin action Lang delivered the car to the plaintiff but, as alleged by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Yelton v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Marix v. FrankeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Peacock v. KirklandOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Gust v. Edwards Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolfgang v. Henry Thiele Catering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API