Legal Opinion

Miner v. Lorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant upon the common counts, relying on an account stated in 1881, on which some payments were then made, and upon a small sum in addition, of which there was some evidence. The evidence showed, by testimony which we think was properly admitted, that in 1871, at the close of their partnership, it was mutu*481ally agreed that the balances then appearing on the books were correct, and that defendant then promised to pay the balance due plaintiff, with interest. No payment was made until more than six years thereafter, in 1881, when the parties figured up the amount due, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Miner v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bennett v. Smith ex rel. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eilke v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Allen v. O'DonaldUnited States Circuit Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API