Legal Opinion

Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Studebaker Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1914No. 313PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Sanitary Street Flushing Machine Company against the Studebaker Corporation. On motion for a stay of proceedings in another action. Motion denied.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant has moved that an order be entered directing plaintiff to' stay all proceedings in the case pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in Sanitary Street Flushing Machine Company v. City of Amsterdam (see 225 Fed. 389), pending final decision and determination of the issue herein, and directing that plaintiff and its representatives be further enjoined from instituting any other or further suits on the patent herein involved against the defendant or its' representa*592tives, or purchasers of defendant’s - machines, pending the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. City of AmsterdamDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. City of AmsterdamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API