Legal Opinion

Spaeda v. Bakirtjy

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided January 14, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

*558OPINION OF THE COURT

Lucy Billings, J.

I. Background

Petitioner landlord commenced this holdover proceeding to recover possession of 211 Front Street, New York County, on the ground that respondent tenant’s lease has expired. Respondent moves to dismiss the petition, claiming his tenancy is rent stabilized, and therefore expiration of his lease is not a permissible ground on which to terminate his tenancy. He bases his claim to rent stabilization on petitioner’s failure to include a necessary clause in each renewal lease entered during the period tax exemption or abatement benefits were granted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Matter of Jose R.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Century Operating Corp. v. PopolizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. David v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API