Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1959No. Civ. No. 23676Published

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The present action was instituted by Bernstein against Cunningham and Rheingold Brewing Company seeking damages for injuries to plaintiff when the car which he was driving was struck in the rear by the car driven by Cunningham allegedly as the agent of Rheingold. In a non-jury trial judgment of nonsuit was rendered in favor of Rheingold and findings and judgment were in favor of plaintiff against Cunningham in the amount of $1,500. In ruling upon plaintiff’s motion for a new trial the court modified its find*285ings and judgment and substituted the amount of $2,500 for the sum previously awarded…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guillory v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Taylor v. PoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Rideau v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Eldridge v. Clark & Henery Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API