Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Sacramento County Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2016No. C077823PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MURRAY, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Paul Cameron appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of administrative mandate challenging the Sacramento County Employees’ Retirement System Board’s (SCERS) decision to reject his application seeking a service-connected disability retirement.
Plaintiff submitted his application for disability retirement on May 22, 2009, after the second of two injuries he sustained during his tenure as a Sacramento County employee. The SCERS staff referred this matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings where it was heard by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Tilbury Constructors, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. BraggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Board of Retirement of Fresno etc. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sandhu v. Bd. of Admin. of CalPERSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025