People v. Aranda
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Corrigan, J.
Stone v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503 , 183 Cal.Rptr. 647 , 646 P.2d 809 ( Stone ) concluded that a court must accept a partial verdict of acquittal as to a charged greater offense when a jury has expressly indicated it has acquitted on that offense but has deadlocked on uncharged lesser included offenses. The question here is whether the Stone rule has been abrogated by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Blueford v. Arkansas (2012) 566 U.S. 599 , 132 S.Ct. 2044 , 182 L.Ed.2d 937 ( Blueford ), which concluded that federal double jeopardy principles do not require a court to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Herrera CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020