Legal Opinion
Wise v. Lanham
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 18, 1997No. Civil No. AMD 94-2457Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
On September 2, 1994, plaintiff Wise, a Maryland prison inmate, instituted the instant action under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against a host of state correctional officials and officers alleging myriad constitutional claims. He filed the complaint pro se. He did not request a jury trial. On March 22, 1995, defendants filed their answer. None of the defendants requested a jury trial. Thus, the deadline for Wise to request a jury trial was April 4,1995. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b).1
After Wise successfully resisted, in part, defendants’ plenary motion for summary judgment, I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McCray v. BurrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Burrell v. McCraySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.