Legal Opinion

State v. Cola

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1992No. 62233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Albert J. Cola, appeals from the order of the trial court denying his motion for return of seized property. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

I

On May 16, 1988, appellant was indicted for one count of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.03. Appellant eventually pleaded guilty to one count of attempted trafficking in drugs, a first degree misdemeanor and was fined $150. On May 30, 1989, appellant filed a “Motion for Return of Seized Property,” to wit: $3,134 in cash, personal papers, and a firearm, all of which were confiscated at the time of his arrest.

On July…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BaumholtzOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ingram v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. GladdenOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Thomas v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Ingram v. City Of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API