Legal Opinion

Orr v. Bergemann

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 28, 1955No. 5-783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This was originally a suit by Kelley Brothers Lumber Company to foreclose a materialman ’s lien upon the house and lot in dispute. There being no question as to the validity of that lien, the real controversy is between the appellant Orr and the appellees Harold and Anita Bergemann. Orr seeks to enforce an oral contract with both the Bergemanns and a written contract with Harold Bergemann only. The chancellor awarded Orr a money judgment upon the written contract but refused to grant any relief upon the oral agreement. Orr contends that he is entitled to specific performance of the parol…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riddick v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Dillard v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API