Spring v. Geriatric Authority of Holyoke
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1ConcurrenceAbrams, J.
(concurring, with whom Liacos, J., joins). I concur with the majority’s reasoning in denying relief to the plaintiff. Unfortunately, on the record before us, there is no remedy for the grievous wrong inflicted on Spring and members of his family. The decedent was an ailing, elderly, incompetent patient at a nursing home. Following the court order terminating the decedent’s dialysis treatments, Matter of Spring, 380 Mass. 629 (1980), two nurses employed by the defendant Authority asked the decedent whether he wanted to die. The nurses, together with four aides, sent a letter and transcript of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Morash & Sons, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.