Legal Opinion

Mizar v. Jones

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 6, 1965No. 20793PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle.

The plaintiffs in error, W. C. Mizar and Donald Nealley, were the plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to as such. The defendant in error, John W. Jones, was the defendant in the trial court and will be referred to as such.

The plaintiffs brought this action seeking damages and rescission of a contract into which they had entered with the defendant. The defendant’s motion, under Rule 41(b) (1), R.C.P. Colo., to dismiss the action because of the plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute the case, was granted, and the plaintiffs seek reversal of that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cervi v. Town of Greenwood VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Yampa Valley Coal Co. v. VelottaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Rudd v. RogersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Johnson v. Westland Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Lake Meredith Reservoir Co. v. Amity Mutual Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Pinkstaff v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Brymerski v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API