Warren v. Alabama Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVIDDE', J.,The bill alleges that on May 8, 1923, “the defendant made and entered into a contract with complainant in the form in general use by complainant.” This sufficiently shows a completed contract between the parties. This allegation is not contradicted by Exhibit A to the bill, which is referred to merely as a substantial copy of the form of the contract •used by complainant in this instance and generally.
Unquestionably, the contract is mutual in its operation and in its benefits, since the promise of one party is always a sufficient consideration for the promise of the other.
As…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Oregon Growers' Co-operative Ass'n v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Denson v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Brock v. HardieSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Louisiana Farm Bureau Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Denton v. Alabama Cotton Co-Op. Ass'nAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.