State v. Dravenstott

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

William Dravenstott appeals his criminal convictions raising two points of error: (1) the trial court erroneously admitted certain evidence; and (2) his convictions for multiple counts of first-degree assault, sec tion 565.050, RSMo 2000, 1 and second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, section 568.050, required inconsistent findings of fact and, therefore, violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. 2 Dravenstott’s claim that the trial court erred in admitting statements he made prior to being given Miranda warnings is denied because Dravenstott was not in…