Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING the FLORIDA BAR 1-7.3

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 9, 2015No. SC14-1165Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

I concur in the majority’s decision to deny the petition at this time. I write separately to explain my reasoning for doing so and to emphasize the critical role of The Florida Bar in solving the current legal aid crisis.

I

Access to justice for all Floridians is fundamental to our legal system and our state. Indeed, it is a fundamental constitutional right.3 For years, this Court has been on the forefront of efforts to promote equal access to justice, and we must continue to ensure — as our Chief Justice has rightly prioritized — that we provide leadership on this issue.

I commend the Chief…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Petition of Florida State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. In Re Interest on Trust Accounts, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. In RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLA. BAR-1-3.1 (A) AND RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMIN.-2.065 (LEGAL AID)Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. In Re Amendments to RulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Matter of Interest on Trust AccountsSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API