People v. Lathon
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Hara Frossard
delivered, the opinion of the court:
In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 455, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 2362-63 (2000), the United States Supreme Court articulated the following constitutional rule and held: “Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490, 147 L. Ed. 2d at 455, 120 S. Ct. at 2362-63. The Court in Apprendi concluded that a New Jersey man who fired shots into the home of an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BeachemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Gray v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. RuckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.