Gibbs Construction Co. v. State, Department of Labor
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentDennis, Justice
I disagree with the majority’s holding that the Louisiana Prevailing Wage Statute (“PWS”) authorizes the Department of Labor (“DOL”) to issue and enforce against a contractor an administrative order to pay wage deficiencies and penalties due a subcontractor’s workers when the state contracting agency has no accrued payments withheld (“retainage”) with which to satisfy the order. Because I believe a fair and impartial reading of the PWS leads to a result different from that found by the majority, I respectfully dissent.
THE DOL IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PWS TO ISSUE OR ENFORCE AN ORDER TO PAY.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Harvester Credit v. SealeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- State v. Union Tank Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. Shreveport News Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Smith v. Town of VintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Vander Sluys v. FinfrockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- GIBBS CONST. CO. v. State, Dept. of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989