Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gibbs Construction Co. v. State, Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 7, 1988No. 88-C-0145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentDennis, Justice

I disagree with the majority’s holding that the Louisiana Prevailing Wage Statute (“PWS”) authorizes the Department of Labor (“DOL”) to issue and enforce against a contractor an administrative order to pay wage deficiencies and penalties due a subcontractor’s workers when the state contracting agency has no accrued payments withheld (“retainage”) with which to satisfy the order. Because I believe a fair and impartial reading of the PWS leads to a result different from that found by the majority, I respectfully dissent.

THE DOL IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PWS TO ISSUE OR ENFORCE AN ORDER TO PAY.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Harvester Credit v. SealeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  2. State v. Union Tank Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. State v. Shreveport News Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Smith v. Town of VintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. Vander Sluys v. FinfrockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. GIBBS CONST. CO. v. State, Dept. of LaborSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API