Legal Opinion

Margolis v. Gosselin

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. 9503837APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Fredric H. Margolis (“plaintiff’) brings this action against Kathryn Gosselin (“defendant”) for damages pursuant to G.L.c. 93A and for tortious interference "with advantageous relations. Asserting that these claims are based on her exercise of her constitutional right to petition, defendant moves for dismissal pursuant to G.L.c. 231, §59H, the “anti-SLAPP” statute. For the reasons stated below, the motion is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

In his complaint and affidavit, plaintiff alleges the following: He is a real estate developer who entered an agreement to purchase a parcel of land in Waltham, with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Rosenbloom v. KokofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. McGhan Medical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Milk Control Board v. Gosselin's Dairy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Municipal Management Associates, Inc. v. BeauregardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  2. Weinberg v. ColonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API