Legal Opinion

In Re Appeal of Barnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1926No. 17061PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This proceeding was instituted, in the county court of Okmulgee county by the filing of a motion, in the name of Jackson Barnett, by his next friend, R. B. Drake, Chief United' States Probate Attorney, to set aside and vacate purported guardianship proceedings of said Jackson Barnett, an incompetent, which were pending in said court. To this motion, E. S. Bailey, the acting guardian of Jackson Barnett, filed a pleading in which he demurred' to the motion of Drake, in so far as he purported to act in his oifieial capacity, and sought to remove him in so far as he purported to act as next…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grinbaum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. M'Donald v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805
  4. Pettigrew v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradburn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Matter of Estate of BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Blancett v. EslingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. In Re Appeal of BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WaldrepCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API