Legal Opinion

State v. Christensen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Kerry Christensen appeals his conviction for first-degree burglary. He claims the trial court erred by denying a motion for acquittal and by not excluding a photographic lineup identification, a subsequent in-court identification, and a computer printout. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] Christensen was convicted of first-degree burglary stemming from an incident that took place at the Ramkota Inn (Ramko-ta) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, during the early morning hours of February 1, 1997. Christensen, a Ramkota security guard, was alleged to have entered a hotel room at the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Kenneth Herbert Linn, A/K/A Dennis Kenneth LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. PfaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HolzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. State v. GonzalezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. State v. BuchholdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API