State v. Christensen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Kerry Christensen appeals his conviction for first-degree burglary. He claims the trial court erred by denying a motion for acquittal and by not excluding a photographic lineup identification, a subsequent in-court identification, and a computer printout. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] Christensen was convicted of first-degree burglary stemming from an incident that took place at the Ramkota Inn (Ramko-ta) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, during the early morning hours of February 1, 1997. Christensen, a Ramkota security guard, was alleged to have entered a hotel room at the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Kenneth Herbert Linn, A/K/A Dennis Kenneth LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. PfaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HolzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- State v. GonzalezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- State v. BuchholdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.