Miners & Merchants Bank v. Dowdall
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
ORDER
2Per curiam
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in this cause on August 6, 1971, which judgment denied plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and also its motion to amend the complaint, and granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
In our view the judgment entered in the district court is correct and should be and is hereby affirmed. Written opinion follows.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON, and MR. JUSTICE CASTLES.
It is our view that the plaintiff was entitled to be heard and for that reason we dissent.
OPINION
3Opinion of the Court · HaswellJustice Haswell
This is an action by plaintiff bank seeking declaratory,…
4Cases cited6 opinions
- Elizabeth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Sterling National Bank of Davie v. William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, (2cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Citizens Bank of Hattiesburg, M. D. Brett and J. W. Mangum v. William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Citizens National Bank of Maplewood v. SaxonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Klanke v. CampDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
5Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PoitrasMontana Supreme Court · 2015