Legal Opinion

People v. Pizano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 4, 2004No. 1-01-4277PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Following a bench trial, defendant Cesar Pizano was convicted of knowingly possessing a fraudulent identification card and sentenced to 18 months’ probation and 7 days in the Sheriffs Work Alternative Program (SWAP). On appeal, he raises the following contentions: (1) his sentence violates the proportionate penalties clause of the Illinois Constitution (111. Const. 1970, art. I, § 11); (2) section 14B(b)(l) of the Illinois Identification Card Act (the Act) (15 ILCS 335/14B(b)(l) (West 1998)) is unconstitutionally overbroad and violates his right to substantive due process; and (3) trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. GerschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Horvath v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API