People v. Pizano
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis
Following a bench trial, defendant Cesar Pizano was convicted of knowingly possessing a fraudulent identification card and sentenced to 18 months’ probation and 7 days in the Sheriffs Work Alternative Program (SWAP). On appeal, he raises the following contentions: (1) his sentence violates the proportionate penalties clause of the Illinois Constitution (111. Const. 1970, art. I, § 11); (2) section 14B(b)(l) of the Illinois Identification Card Act (the Act) (15 ILCS 335/14B(b)(l) (West 1998)) is unconstitutionally overbroad and violates his right to substantive due process; and (3) trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. GerschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. HauschildIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Horvath v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.