Legal Opinion

State v. Baltier

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1973No. 2466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Rudolph Brito Baltier, appeals from a judgment of guilt on the sale of a narcotic drug (L.S.D.) in violation of ARS § 32-1964, (now repealed and covered by other sections). Defendant was sentenced to not less than one nor more than three years in the Arizona State Prison.

Baltier presents one question on appeal: Could he, acting only as a procuring agent for the buyer, be convicted of selling dangerous drugs under ARS § 32-1964?

The facts necessary for determination of the matter on appeal are as follows: The defendant waived his right to a jury trial, was tried…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. The PEOPLE v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. United States v. Robert E. BarcellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. GalvanArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CattaneoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. State v. YanichArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  4. State v. TubbsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API