Legal Opinion

State v. Coyaso

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1992No. 15426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KLEIN, J.

We granted certiorari to review the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) holding that prejudice to the defendant is a required factor which must be considered by the trial court in deciding whether to dismiss a case with or without prejudice for violation of Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 48. Although prejudice to the defendant may be a relevant consideration, it is not a mandatory one, and failure to make findings as to prejudice is not an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. With respect to the issue before us, we reverse. 1

I

On July 6, 1990,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Franklyn ArangoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. United States v. Louis GiambroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Grover C. Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. JacksonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HutchHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. PulseHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API