Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. Sheridan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court correctly found that the former wife failed to make out a prima facie case of entitlement to modifica*605tion of the maintenance provisions of the parties’ separation agreement which was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of divorce. The wife failed to establish that the continued enforcement of the maintenance provisions would create an extreme hardship for her (see, Zinkiewicz v Zinkiewicz, 222 AD2d 684; Didley v Didley, 194 AD2d 7, 10). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion in the absence of a hearing. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Didley v. DidleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Zinkiewicz v. ZinkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Mishrick v. MishrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Haydock v. HaydockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Luftig v. LuftigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Vinnik v. VinnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.