Legal Opinion

State v. Hatfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On error to the Passaic Sessions.

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of embezzlement upon two indictments, tried together, in the Passaic Sessions, and brings this writ of error upon exceptions taken at the trial. The embezzlement charged was of the moneys of the Dime Savings and Loan Association, of New Jersey, a corporation for which he (the defendant) was acting as agent. The indictments, although legally sufficient, were very general, simply charging the embezzlement, at dates specified, of particular sums of money mentioned belonging to the association.

The defendant, after denial of a motion to quash the indictments, moved that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. State v. SullivanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. People v. JasieckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. MarinellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. State v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API