Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 2004No. B167180PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
Appellant Assa Weinberg, M.D., sought administrative mandamus against respondent Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. The trial court denied Weinberg’s petition. We affirm.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Respondent is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and accredited acute care hospital. Weinberg, a licensed physician, was appointed to respondent’s medical staff in 1988. The case before us arises out of disciplinary proceedings against Weinberg that culminated in the termination of his staff privileges and membership.
Under the constitution, rules, and regulations of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- El-Attar v. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Eight Unnamed Physicians v. Medical Executive CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bode v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ellison v. SEQUOIA HEALTH SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.