Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Steel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 30, 1968No. 4669Published

1Concurrence

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

I concur in the result but do not agree with the reasons stated therefor in the majority opinion. Neither do I agree with the applicability of the authority cited therein. It seems to me that the statute governing actions of the court after the expiration of the term is applicable here and that there is a possibility that a showing might have been made to support the action of the trial court in setting aside its earlier order.

I still would deny the writ. The original complaint was deficient in that the plaintiff had not been appointed administratrix, even though she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schiele v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Lewelling v. Manufacturing Wood Workers UnderwritersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Bunch v. LauniusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API