Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Because I agree with appellant Mathe-son Tri-Gas, Inc. that the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of appellee Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. contradicts this Court’s previous ruling in Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. Atmel Corporation, 347 S.W.3d 339 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2011, no pet.) {“Atmel ”), I respectfully dissent on the issue related to the breach of contract claim.

While I agree with the majority’s statement that we were not asked in Atmel to draw any conclusion about whether this Agreement (referred to as the MTG/Maxim Agreement in our Atmel opinion), as written, was enforceable against…